Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01647
Original file (BC 2014 01647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-01647
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: YES


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, reflect the following awards:

   a.  Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR).

   b.  Good Conduct Medal.

   c.  Vietnam Medals and any additional awards he is entitled 
to (Administratively Corrected)


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The contested awards were omitted from his DD Form 214.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 August 
1965.

On 12 March 1969, the applicant was honorably released from 
active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve in the 
grade of sergeant under the provisions of AFM 39-10.  He served 
3 years, 7 months and 8 days on active duty and credited with 
2 years, 6 months and 28 days of foreign and/or service. 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of award of the SAEMR and Good 
Conduct Medal.







DPSID states the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon is 
awarded to all United States Air Force members who after 1 
January 1963, qualify as “expert” in small-arms marksmanship 
with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun.  Qualification as 
“expert” in both weapons after 22 June 1972 shall be denoted by 
a bronze service star worn on the service ribbon.

There is no official documentation in the applicant’s official 
personnel records verifying he qualified as expert with either 
the M-16 rifle or issue handgun to be eligible for award of the 
SAEMR. 

The Good Conduct Medal is awarded to enlisted members who have 
honorably completed three continuous years of active military 
service subsequent to 26 August 1940, and who are recommended by 
their commanding officers for exemplary behavior, efficiency, 
and fidelity.  This medal is only award to Airman prior to the 
establishment of the Air Force Good Conduct Medal on 1 June 
1963.  In accordance with Executive Order 8809, amended by 
Executive Order 9323, the Good Conduct Medal may also be awarded 
to service members who complete more than one year but less than 
three years of active federal military service if the Air Force 
Good Conduct Medal has not been previously awarded.  The Good 
Conduct Medal is awarded for a one-year period of service during 
a time of war only when a formal declaration of war has been 
made and approved by the United States Congress.

They were unable to verify award of the Good Conduct Medal.  The 
applicant’s dates of service are after the awarding dates for 
award of the Good Conduct Medal.

They were unable to determine the applicant fit the criteria for 
award of any additional awards.  To grant relief would be 
contrary to the criteria established by DoDM 1348.33, Secretary 
of the Air Force, Chief of Staff, and/or the War Department.

Based on their review of the applicant’s official military 
personnel record, they were able to determine that the Vietnam 
Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/2BSS) and the 
Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) should 
have been awarded during the applicant’s service from 5 August 
1965 to 12 March 1969 and was not reflected in his records.  
Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the 
applicant’s official military personnel record will be completed 
by AFPC/DPSOR.

The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.






APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 3 October 2014, a copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the 
existence of an error or injustice.  Therefore, other than the 
administrative corrections cited above, we find no basis to 
recommend granting any additional relief sought in this 
application.

4.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.












The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01647 in Executive Session on 5 February 2015, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 31 May 2014.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Available Master Personnel Records.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 22 September 2014.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 October 2014.





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04499

    Original file (BC 2013 04499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the SAEMR. Upon final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03108

    Original file (BC 2014 03108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Based on review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03134

    Original file (BC 2012 03134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID states the SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04546

    Original file (BC 2013 04546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02691

    Original file (BC 2014 02691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02691 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the following awards and ribbons: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03952

    Original file (BC-2012-03952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the Presidential Unit Citation, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award and the Air Force Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02597

    Original file (BC 2013 02597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 Aug 13, AFPC/DPSID notified the applicant they were able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and will correct his records administratively. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, there is no documentation in the applicant’s military personnel records verifying he was in the area of eligibility for the VSM or that he qualified as expert with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03049

    Original file (BC 2014 03049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualified as “expert” in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issued handgun. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID notes the applicant’s entitlement RVGC w/P, AFLSA, AFOUA, PUC, Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05391

    Original file (BC 2012 05391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the SAEMR indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who after, 1 Jan 63, qualified as “expert” in small...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02342

    Original file (BC 2013 02342.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 September 2013, AFPC/DPAPP reviewed the applicant’s records and verified his boots on the ground Foreign Service time at Aviano Air Base, Italy from 11 July 1979 through 29 March 1982, the amount of Foreign Service time already listed on his DD Form 214. The SAEMR is awarded to all United States Air Force Service members who, after 1 January 1963, qualify as “expert” in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. There is insufficient documentation to support...